
How the Trust Score Is Calculated
AutoProctor monitors candidates in real time across multiple channels (depending on your proctoring settings):- Camera feed
- Microphone feed
- Screen activity
| Factor | How It Affects the Score |
|---|---|
| Type of violation | Different violations carry different weights. Tab switching impacts the score more heavily than noise detection. |
| Frequency of violations | More incidents result in a lower score. |
| Duration of violations | Extended violations reduce the score more significantly than brief ones. |
What Is a Good Trust Score?
As a general guideline, review the evidence for any candidate with a Trust Score below 85%. This threshold is meant for review, not as proof of misconduct.Environmental factors can significantly impact scoring. For example, a candidate in a noisy room near traffic could receive a 0% Trust Score even when no actual cheating occurred. The microphone picks up ambient noise and the system cannot always distinguish between human speech and background sound. Always check the evidence before making a determination.
How to Review a Trust Score
Open your test results
Go to your AutoProctor dashboard, select a test, and click Results. You see a list of all candidates with their Trust Scores.
Identify candidates for review
Sort by Trust Score and focus on candidates scoring below 85%. These attempts are the most likely to contain violations worth reviewing.
Review the violation evidence
Click View Report on a candidate’s row to see the detailed breakdown: flagged photos, screenshots, audio clips, and a timeline of detected violations.
Related Resources
- What Gets Tracked — All monitoring capabilities available
- Proctoring Results — How to view violation evidence and reports
- Access Answers and Candidate Responses — Reviewing a single candidate’s report in detail
- No Face or Multiple Faces Detected — Why face detection may flag false positives
- False App Switch Violation — Understanding false violation flags
- Best Practices for Test Creators — Tips for running effective proctored tests